This was the heart of Spallate, a screenwriting workshop organized by WYN, a community for audiovisual professionals. I took part in two intensive weekends working on the story for a film, digging into my perspective and refining the theme. No algorithm can do this work for me. On one hand, AI is a tool that makes creativity more accessible. On the other, we see growing insecurity in people’s creative abilities. Maybe because we’ve become more critical, more curators than creators. Maybe because AI is designed to please us, not to challenge us. The event took place at Blackball, a Milan-based production company that blends commercial and narrative filmmaking. A perfect example of how having a strong identity in both fields is becoming increasingly crucial. I’ve spent another winter on stage, having fun diving deeper into the art of acting — or should I say, playing? We live in an era obsessed with speed and optimization. But not everything should be optimized. There is value in learning to embrace processes and imperfections. Why work with actors when digital avatars and deepfakes exist? Because AI can imitate, but it cannot feel. Actors live, AI merely replicates patterns. "To be or not to be, that is the question." Hamlet’s famous line has become almost a cliché, almost a joke. And yet, today more than ever, it feels like a manifesto. AI is driving down the cost of visual production. Think about the use of AI in "Here" by Robert Zemeckis: an advanced system for real-time facial de-aging. The result is incredible. But in the end, what truly moves us is the story. It’s the actors’ performances. Another recent example of AI in cinema is "The Brutalist", a film that sparked controversy for using AI to modify the Hungarian accents of Adrien Brody and Felicity Jones, making them sound more authentic. This technology had already been used in "The Mandalorian", but this time, audiences only discovered after watching that the voices had been digitally altered, reigniting the debate on AI’s role in filmmaking. Yet, this didn’t stop Brody from winning an Oscar for his performance. If the cost of images is approaching zero, their value is also approaching zero. That’s why I keep shooting on film, writing with a team of people, and working with real-life actors. Because AI can amplify creativity, but it cannot replace the human process. Technology accelerates, but the soul of a story remains in the hands of those who tell it.
| |
Why I'd only shoot on film (or with an iPhone) Every executive producer would hate me. Higher costs, higher risks, zero guarantees. And yet today, if I had to choose, I'd only shoot on film. Not for nostalgia. Not for the look. Not to play the vintage filmmaker. Film brings imperfection. It brings the unexpected. It forces you to limit your takes, to know what you want before you turn the camera on. It demands a clear, strong vision, because you can't afford to be vague. At a time when...
One Battle After Another "One battle after another" — I kept telling myself this throughout the year as a reminder: this work has never been easy. It's always been a battle. Creative work is changing shape. At a time when everyone's looking for ways to stand out, bringing narrative depth to a brand brief makes the difference in a complex, saturated landscape. So I stopped waiting for the phone to ring to shoot. I structured something I was already doing informally: working with brands and...
I met Virgilio Villoresi in Milan. We spent two hours talking about stop motion, 16mm film, optical effects. About making handmade cinema in a world racing towards AI. He's the latest filmmaker I interviewed for Cinema Club, my column for Perimetro exploring independent, auteur cinema. It's my way of building a network of people to exchange ideas with and grow as an author. Over the past year and a half, I've spoken with Carlo Sironi, Tommaso Santambrogio, Giacomo Abbruzzese, Beniamino...